Re: Change requested on Editorial Issue for SDP-US FPWD (Section 8.1.2)

implemented (mostly)... see below

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Monica Martin (MS OPEN TECH) <
momartin@microsoft.com> wrote:

>  This is a revised proposal for Section 8.1.2 (
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2012Sep/0019.html) based on
> offline comments received. ****
>
> ** **
>
> **1.       **R0045****
>
> Change from: Durations (dur) *shall* only be used on the span element.****
>
> Change to: Durations (dur) *shall* be used on the span element.
>

not sure what to change here if anything, as per prior instructions, had
already changed above to read:

Durations (dur) *shall* only be used on the span element for Roll-up style
content.

In any case, the suggested "Durations (dur) *shall* be used on the span
element." doesn't make any sense.


> ****
>
> ** **
>
> **2.       **Informative note. ****
>
> Delete existing note.
>
done

> **3.       **Add informative note in Section 6.4.2 where content is
> described and examples exist.****
>
> Rollup style captions are typically characterized by words (or small
> groups of letters) appearing sequentially, so that a line fills up
> incrementally, and then as new lines are added the upper lines are scrolled
> out of view.****
>
> Pop on style captions are typically characterized by small blocks of text
> that appear all at once.****
>
> A paint-on caption typically appears on the screen one character at a time
> and is displayed like a pop-up caption.
>
done (as 3 notes) - you didn't indicate whether to make one or three;

*also* did global change to make consistent use of 'Roll-up', 'Pop-up' (not
pop-on), and 'Paint-on'

*also* do not understand the prose on E0005 "The Paint-on text is often
embodied in Roll-up content." this is confusing since it mixes two modes in
one sentence