W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > October 2009

Re: DynamicFlow002

From: Glenn Adams <gadams@xfsi.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:48:46 +0800
Message-ID: <94ad087a0910291648x2b59dd82t37b4c93795c0c29f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: Glenn Adams <glenn@xfsi.com>, public-tt@w3.org
I will change the example and test to adhere to the syntax spec. No need to
change the syntax. Also, btw, I expect to make a change to the rollUp test
after conferring with Geoff on that feature.

G.

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Glenn,
>
> In test DynamicFlow002 (and the specification as well), you use the
> value
>  in(word,jump) fill(1.0s) out(line,smooth) clear(break,0.3s)
>
> however, the syntax for dynamic flow is
>  <flowFunction>+ <flowIntervalFunction>*
>
> which means the flow function out() needs to appear before fill:
>
> in(word,jump) out(line,smooth) fill(1.0s) clear(break,0.3s)
>
> Did you mean the syntax for dynamic flow to be
>
> ( <flowFunction> <flowIntervalFunction>* )+
>
> instead?
>
> Philippe
>
>
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 23:49:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 2 November 2009 22:41:44 GMT