Re: DynamicFlow002

I will change the example and test to adhere to the syntax spec. No need to
change the syntax. Also, btw, I expect to make a change to the rollUp test
after conferring with Geoff on that feature.

G.

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Glenn,
>
> In test DynamicFlow002 (and the specification as well), you use the
> value
>  in(word,jump) fill(1.0s) out(line,smooth) clear(break,0.3s)
>
> however, the syntax for dynamic flow is
>  <flowFunction>+ <flowIntervalFunction>*
>
> which means the flow function out() needs to appear before fill:
>
> in(word,jump) out(line,smooth) fill(1.0s) clear(break,0.3s)
>
> Did you mean the syntax for dynamic flow to be
>
> ( <flowFunction> <flowIntervalFunction>* )+
>
> instead?
>
> Philippe
>
>