W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > May 2009

Agenda for meeting 22-05-09

From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:45:33 +0100
To: Public TTWG List <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AB3FC8E280628440B366A29DABB6B6E8075D977414@EA-EXMSG-C334.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
Reminder folks that we will be meeting today at the normal time.

There are a number of open issues around dynamicFlow to be resolved, and we have only a week till we were planning to go to last call. Hopefully everyone has now had time to review, and is satisfied with the remainder of the text

Rough agenda:

Issues to be closed pending action:

ISSUE-72 smooth scrolling - [deferred to v-next unless anyone wishes to re-open the discussion]

ISSUE-92  xml:base not included [action Glenn to resolve]

ISSUE-93 replacing 'base' attribute on ttp:{extensions,features} with xml:base [action Glenn to resolve]

ISSUE-94 declaration of TTAF1 namespace mutability [resolved as mutable - Editor to implement], remaining issue is whether to maintain the extension namespaces.

ISSUE-95 create TTAF1 {feature,extension} documents [Editorial]

ISSUE-96 full feature profile Creation of a profile which encompasses all of DFXP [resolved 15-5-09 Editor to implement]

ISSUE-101 rollup interval OPEN aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [resolved on list - editor to add note]

"NOTE: This time interval is intended to be compatible with "Closed Caption Decoder Requirements for Analog Television," page 792 (http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2005/octqtr/47cfr15.119.htm), and "Closed Captioning Requirements for Digital Television Receivers," Sections 9.10.4 and 9.10.5 (http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1999/fcc99180.txt)."

Issues still requiring discussion and resolution

ISSUE-97 metadata content model [open]

ISSUE-106 L XSL linebreaking not specified [open]

dynamicFlow editorial issues

ISSUE-102 rename intra and inter OPEN Use descriptive names for the intra and inter operations
ISSUE-103 specification of flowFunction OPEN Dont allow multiple flowFunctions
ISSUE-104 Clarify language around flowBuffer OPEN Clarify language around flowBuffer (Editorial) 0

dynamicFlow discussion [waiting on response from Glenn]

ISSUE-98 Clear timing. OPEN Eliminate separate clear timing from dynamicFlow
ISSUE-99 clear semantics OPEN What happens when fill operations are blocked (related to Issue 98)
ISSUE-100 Fill units OPEN No fill unit for content area, and block and inline units not well specified
ISSUE-105 dynamicFlow and noWrap OPEN Interaction between the dynamicFlow feature and the noWrap feature

Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 11:46:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:04 UTC