W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > May 2009

RE: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)]

From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 11:07:20 +0100
To: "Glenn A. Adams" <gadams@xfsi.com>, Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>, Public TTWG List <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AB3FC8E280628440B366A29DABB6B6E8075D4F5513@EA-EXMSG-C334.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
Informative text is fine by me. I just didn't want a value seemingly plucked out of nowhere.

Sean Hayes
Media Accessibility Strategist
Accessibility Business Unit
Microsoft

Office:  +44 118 909 5867,
Mobile: +44 7875 091385


-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn A. Adams [mailto:gadams@xfsi.com]
Sent: 16 May 2009 4:41 AM
To: Geoff Freed; Sean Hayes; Public TTWG List
Subject: Re: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)]


if we retain the same definition for "rollUp", then it would better to
document he origin of the value in informative text (i.e., a note), rather
than in normative prose;

On 5/15/09 8:28 PM, "Geoff Freed" <geoff_freed@wgbh.org> wrote:

>
> for section 8.2.7
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ttaf1-dfxp-20090511/#style-attribute-dynamicFlow
> ), paragraph #5:
>
> "If the value of this attribute is rollUp, then this value is interpreted as a
> shorthand value equivalent to out(line,smooth) inter(0.433s).  This time
> interval is defined by "Closed Caption Decoder Requirements for Analog
> Television," page 792
> (http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2005/octqtr/47cfr15.119.htm).
>
> how's that?
>
> g.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Sean Hayes [Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 7:04 AM
> To: Geoff Freed; Timed Text Working Group WG
> Subject: RE: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup
> needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)]
>
> That would be helpful. If you can suggest wording for the spec that would be
> even better.
>
> Sean Hayes
> Media Accessibility Strategist
> Accessibility Business Unit
> Microsoft
>
> Office:  +44 118 909 5867,
> Mobile: +44 7875 091385
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-tt-request@w3.org [mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
> Geoff Freed
> Sent: 15 May 2009 11:57 AM
> To: Timed Text Working Group WG
> Subject: RE: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs
> justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)]
>
>
> this corresponds to the speed of the scroll of 608 roll-up displays, i
> believe.  i can look this up if you need me to.
>
> g.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: public-tt-request@w3.org [public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Timed
> Text Working Group Issue Tracker [sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:54 AM
> To: public-tt@w3.org
> Subject: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs
> justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)]
>
> ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs
> justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)]
>
> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/101
>
> Raised by: Sean Hayes
> On product: DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)
>
> In the Proposed 'rollup' shorthand. The 'inter' value of 0.433s needs some
> justification or explanantion
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 16 May 2009 10:08:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 2 November 2009 22:41:42 GMT