W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > May 2009

RE: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)]

From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:04:19 +0100
To: Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>, Timed Text Working Group WG <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AB3FC8E280628440B366A29DABB6B6E8075D4F52D7@EA-EXMSG-C334.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
That would be helpful. If you can suggest wording for the spec that would be even better.

Sean Hayes
Media Accessibility Strategist
Accessibility Business Unit
Microsoft

Office:  +44 118 909 5867,
Mobile: +44 7875 091385


-----Original Message-----
From: public-tt-request@w3.org [mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Freed
Sent: 15 May 2009 11:57 AM
To: Timed Text Working Group WG
Subject: RE: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)]


this corresponds to the speed of the scroll of 608 roll-up displays, i believe.  i can look this up if you need me to.

g.

________________________________________
From: public-tt-request@w3.org [public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker [sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:54 AM
To: public-tt@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)]

ISSUE-101 (rollup interval): aribitrary interval for rollup needs justification [DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)]

http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/101

Raised by: Sean Hayes
On product: DFXP 1.0 (Editorial)

In the Proposed 'rollup' shorthand. The 'inter' value of 0.433s needs some justification or explanantion
Received on Friday, 15 May 2009 11:05:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 2 November 2009 22:41:42 GMT