W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > May 2009

RE: ISSUE-94: declaration of TTAF1 namespace mutability [DFXP 1.0]

From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:27:52 +0100
To: Timed Text Working Group WG <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AB3FC8E280628440B366A29DABB6B6E8074ACA0CB2@EA-EXMSG-C334.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
My feeling is that all the tt namespaces are mutable, and that the working group is the controller of any changes. However we explicitly define extension namespaces, do these imply that the our philosophy was that they are not, and are these in fact necessary if we declare that the styling namespace (for example) is mutable?

Sean Hayes
Media Accessibility Strategist
Accessibility Business Unit
Microsoft

Office:  +44 118 909 5867,
Mobile: +44 7875 091385


-----Original Message-----
From: public-tt-request@w3.org [mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker
Sent: 06 May 2009 7:19 AM
To: public-tt@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-94: declaration of TTAF1 namespace mutability [DFXP 1.0]


ISSUE-94: declaration of TTAF1 namespace mutability [DFXP 1.0]

http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/94


Raised by: Glenn Adams
On product: DFXP 1.0

according to [1], we should explicitly specify whether the TTAF1 namespace is mutable or not;

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/namespaceState.html







Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 09:39:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 2 November 2009 22:41:42 GMT