- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:05:34 +1000
- To: Glenn Adams <gadams@xfsi.com>
- Cc: Weck Daniel <daniel.weck@gmail.com>, "public-tt@w3.org List TTWG" <public-tt@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Glenn Adams<gadams@xfsi.com> wrote: > But they (end and dur) can be used together, and such use is well defined by > SMIL semantics, and has a well defined resolution. See [1] under "Defining > the simple duration" and "Active duration algorithm". We most vehemently do > not wish to attempt to re-express or paraphrase this (admittedly) complex > portion of the SMIL specification. > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20051213/smil-timing.html#Timing-SemanticsOfTimingModel Thanks for that pointer. I think the only thing relevant to us out of that 119 page document is the single line: PAD = MIN( Result from Intermediate Active Duration Computation, end - B) which says that the duration of the element is the minimum of "dur" and "end - start". Why make people read 119 pages, when it can be specified so simply? Regards, Silvia.
Received on Monday, 29 June 2009 03:06:37 UTC