W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Alternate syntax for required features.

From: Glenn A. Adams <gadams@xfsi.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:49:55 +0800
To: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, Public TTWG List <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C60D5883.A383%gadams@xfsi.com>

On 4/16/09 7:36 PM, "Sean Hayes" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com> wrote:

> In either case the features work is a major part of the spec now, and should
> not be pushed off into an annexe, but should form a normative section in the
> main body.
It is normative as currently specified, so it matters not whether it is in
an appendix or main body. I prefer an appendix, since it may be modified
more frequently. In any case, I still oppose the proposed change, for no
reason other than adding a new feature means adding a new attribute which
means changing the schema. Any change to a schema should require a very high
bar in my opinion.


Received on Thursday, 16 April 2009 13:50:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:04 UTC