W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > December 2008

Re: TT telecon - agenda for 12 Dec

From: Glenn A. Adams <gadams@xfsi.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:32:41 +0800
To: John Birch <john.birch@screen.subtitling.com>, <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, <david.kirby@rd.bbc.co.uk>, Public TTWG List <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C569B049.6EAA%gadams@xfsi.com>

Please read (carefully) Sections 3.1 and 4 of the current DFXP CR, which
yields the same behavior as SVG with regard to foreign namespace items, but
specifies it in a more precise manner. If you have specific issues with the
current language, then please say so.

On 12/13/08 5:15 PM, "John Birch" <john.birch@screen.subtitling.com> wrote:

> So would the use of foreign namespaces match that defined in section 23 of the
> svg document? I particularly like the descriptive text in section 23.1? And
> the example... The comment about the reasons for allowing this feature are
> particularly relevant to me (private data). Can we include similar text and
> examples in the dfxp spec?
Received on Saturday, 13 December 2008 10:33:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:03 UTC