Re: [DFXP LC Comment] Some questions (was: Re: [tt] Some questions)

Glenn A. Adams wrote:
> I stand corrected; however, it still requires a enhanced parser, and, as
> long as one is making such a modification, it also would not require any
> more effort to create a parser that treated "id" identically the same as
> "xml:id".
> 
> In any case, I will take your proposal to the WG, and provide their
> consensus position when it is finalized.

Another point would be that xml:lang and xml:space are also used in the 
specification. Using xml:id makes it more consistent imho.


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>

Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2005 15:16:32 UTC