Glenn A. Adams wrote: > I stand corrected; however, it still requires a enhanced parser, and, as > long as one is making such a modification, it also would not require any > more effort to create a parser that treated "id" identically the same as > "xml:id". > > In any case, I will take your proposal to the WG, and provide their > consensus position when it is finalized. Another point would be that xml:lang and xml:space are also used in the specification. Using xml:id makes it more consistent imho. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2005 15:16:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 2 November 2009 22:41:32 GMT