W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > February 2003

RE : RE : [Moderator Action] Bugs and TT (was TT and subtitling)

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:00:10 +0100
To: <lists@wiltgen.net>, <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000701c2ce98$1784df90$0200a8c0@wistiti>

posted

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : public-tt-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-tt-request@w3.org] De la part de lists@wiltgen.net
> Envoyé : jeudi 6 février 2003 18:07
> À : public-tt@w3.org
> Objet : RE : [Moderator Action] Bugs and TT (was TT and subtitling)
> 
> 
> 
> >>> Current multimedia standards (eg SMIL) are generally not 
> appropriate 
> >>> for subtitling.
> >>
> >> That's a tad broad.
> >
> > I have looked at SMIL and Quicktime and cannot see how to reconcile 
> > the timing aspects of these standards with the timecode in 
> an external 
> > broadcast signal (where the timecode may be discontinuous due to 
> > advert insertion). Comments please?
> 
> My throw-it-out-there-and-see-what-sticks Proposal 0.0, which 
> uses the SMIL timing model, illustrates how relative timing 
> works.  The SMIL timing model also supports absolute timing.
> 
> -- Charles Wiltgen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 06:00:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 2 November 2009 22:41:26 GMT