Re: Topics for tomorrow

On 11/15/2017 6:29 AM, Rob van Eijk wrote:
> RE: Topics for tomorrow
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Just read the minutes.
>
> >> schunter: If the WP29 opinion shows support for automated means 
> such as DNT, that will help get interest.
>
> The Working Party is working on Consent Guidelines in article 4(11) of 
> the GDPR. This is mentioned in the public agenda of the working party [1].
>
> The notion of consent in the draft ePR is linked to the notion of 
> consent in the GDPR. Because DNT is linked to ePR-consent, and given 
> the guidance by the working group on the ePR, it is unlikely that the 
> opinion will show support for DNT.
>

I can't claim to understand the politics of what shows support for what, 
but I don't understand why the opinion is unlikely to show support for DNT.

W3M was on a path to close TPWG 18 months ago.  We reversed that path 
because we were told that DNT was critical for GDPR.  I infer that it is 
not the case that DNT is critical for GDPR and we were mistaken when we 
reversed path 18 months ago.  Am I understanding this correctly?

> Rob
>
> [1] http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/document.cfm?doc_id=47530
>
> —
> PGP fingerprint: 704F 4955 F7E3 044E 4084 19E2 2844 CDDC A655 DB3C 
> [_public_key_ 
> <https://www.natuurlijkehaarkleuring.nl/.well-known/pgp/0xA655DB3C.asc>]
>
> PGP verification is published in DNS which is secured by DNSSEC 
> [_rob._pka.blaeu.com_ 
> <https://toolbox.googleapps.com/apps/dig/#TXT/rob._pka.blaeu.com>]
>
>     -----Original message-----
>     *From:* Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
>     *Sent:* Sunday, November 12 2017, 9:18 am
>     *To:* public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
>     *Subject:* Topics for tomorrow
>
>     Hi Folks,
>
>     I suggest to discuss three topics:
>     1. How to get text proposals for issue 60 (purposes)
>     2. Actions to kick-off 2018 charter and to get new members joining
>     3. Status of implementations (needed for REC).
>
>     Regards,
>     matthias
>
>