Re: Call on Monday

• From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
• Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:09:52 -0700
• To: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
• Cc: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>, Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <CB849B1F-79F9-4019-9D94-7A670C4CBAAB@gbiv.com>

> On Aug 21, 2017, at 8:51 AM, David Singer <singer@mac.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Aug 21, 2017, at 8:29 , Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Folks, the only question we should discuss regarding 10.1 is whether the text is consistent with the WG decision that is long since closed.
> 
> No, that really isn’t the only question.  At this point we should only be doing edits that are agreed by the group, apart from trivial editorials. Even re-stating agreements leads to changes of nuance. Where is the group decision to write 10.1?

IMO, that is a trivial editorial.  In any case, that's a fanciful view
of how the editor function works, given the paucity of WG-driven text.

....Roy

Received on Monday, 21 August 2017 16:10:16 UTC