- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:35:27 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Oct 14, 2014, at 10:29 , Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:23 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >> Where I think we are with the LC issues. The debate with Anne is ongoing, and I am just the editor; decisions are the WG’s. > > Not all my replies are covered here. Do I need to send them again? Surely. I went through all the emails with this subject, and apologies if I missed something. We did discuss what the JS property should return, and Roy adjusted it to be null-able, and the sense was, I think that it should be documented as returning whatever the UA would send as the DNT header value. If the UA makes up an extension after the 1 or 0, it should include that, so it’s not an enum. David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 17:36:03 UTC