Re: link shorteners etc.

I don’t understand.  How are we supposed to tell someone we think the language they are suggesting solves the issue being raised?

On Jun 26, 2014, at 7:42 AM, Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> John,
>  
> No disrespect but I thought we had agreed as a group to halt sending “+1” emails on the list?
>  
> - Shane
>  
> From: John Simpson [mailto:john@consumerwatchdog.org] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 7:29 AM
> To: David Singer
> Cc: Walter van Holst; public-tracking@w3.org
> Subject: Re: link shorteners etc.
>  
> David,
>  
> Goog language, I think.
>  
> Regards,
> John
>  
> On Jun 26, 2014, at 7:24 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> For the avoidance of doubt, link shorteners are not destinations, and not destinations that a user intends to visit, and hence are third parties as defined in this recommendation.”