Re: Agenda for July 9 TPWG call

My regrets, I am at an MPEG meeting in Japan

comments below

On Jul 9, 2014, at 2:29 , Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org> wrote:

> 2. Use of "tracking" in compliance
> 
> ISSUE-203: Use of "tracking" in third-party compliance
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/203
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Tracking_Third_Party_Compliance
> July 9: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals 

Roy and I have started discussion offline but we have not converged (yet).

> 
> 3. Link shorteners/ID providers
> 
> ISSUE-97: Re-direction, shortened URLs, click analytics -- what kind of tracking is this?
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/97
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposals_on_link_shorteners_and_ID_providers
> July 9: M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal. 

I believe there was active discussion that was leading to a change proposal to define a URL shortener as always being a third party, but this is not captured on the Wiki.


David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 05:35:58 UTC