Re: Agenda for February 5 call

Same here.

Lee

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 4, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> Sending my regrets for tomorrow's meeting.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ninja Marnau [mailto:ninja@w3.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 3:34 PM
> To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
> Subject: Agenda for February 5 call
> 
> ----------------------------------
> 
> 1. Confirmation of scribe. Volunteers welcome!
> 
> 2. Offline-caller-identification (see end for instructions)
> 
> ----------------------------------
> --- Issues for this Call ---
> 
> Note: See more info at the end for details.
> 
> ISSUE-239: Should tracking status representation include an array of links for claiming compliance by reference?
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/239
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Proposals_on_status_URL_array_for_compliance_regimes 
> 
> Announcement of consensus for text proposal 1 on the wiki
> 
> ISSUE-241: Distinguish elements for site-internal use and elements that can be re-used by others (1/3)
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/241
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Proposals_on_elements_for_1and3_party_use 
> 
> February 5: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus February 19: M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections
> (2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts
> 
> ISSUE-240: Do we need to define context?
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/240
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Proposals_on_the_definition_of_context
> February 5: M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal February 12: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus
> 
> AoB
> 
> ================ Summary Documentation on Resolving ISSUES =================
> 
> PHASES to resolve issues:
> M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change proposals should be drafted
> M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals
> M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal
> M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus
> M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts
> M7 (announcement): Results are announced
> 
> STATUS of the ISSUES:
> - OPEN During phases M0, M1, M2
> - PENDING REVIEW: During phases M3, M5
> - CLOSED after M7
> All other issues are RAISED.
> -----
> ================ Infrastructure =================
> 
> Zakim teleconference bridge:
> VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
> Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225) IRC Chat: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt
> 
> OFFLINE caller identification:
> If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call
> (command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number, please email your name and phone number to npdoty@w3.org<mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to reduce (in fact,
> eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 21:17:59 UTC