- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:50:18 -0700
- To: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Jul 12, 2014, at 6:38 PM, Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > tracking-ISSUE-248: using Unicode notation in ABNF [TPE Last Call] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/248 > > Raised by: Nick Doty > On product: TPE Last Call > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking-comments/2014Jun/0022.html > I18N-ISSUE-346 > > [Editorial][Nit] In this section, the characters "1" and "0" are referred to using ABNF %31 and %30 respectively. Generally when referring to characters, we prefer to see the Unicode U+NNNN notation used also so that it is clear that you are referring to the character value and not a byte value. The parenthetical notes of (%x31) and (%x30) have been removed in r1.272 because they are truly unnecessary and make the prose harder to read. There is no need to use U+NNNN notation here. ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2014 00:50:38 UTC