- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:48:18 -0400
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 4/23/14, 11:39 AM, Jack L. Hobaugh Jr wrote: > NAI agrees with this stated principle but the TPE does not provide > the necessary requirements for enforcing this principle within the > protocol or for determining a rogue DNT signal. Has there been any technical discussion of how this might be done? I'm skeptical, as you can imagine. (But as always, hopeful and curious.) best, Joe - -- Joseph Lorenzo Hall Chief Technologist Center for Democracy & Technology 1634 I ST NW STE 1100 Washington DC 20006-4011 (p) 202-407-8825 (f) 202-637-0968 joe@cdt.org PGP: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTV/ziAAoJEF+GaYdAqahxOeAQAJuLUi9MxDhNqTpjdPHVIfX7 asR+7g5V9ZwZH6KcFBI46WQOmORY9WeV+NoYB6WlOCehC2yF3SWnM2DgEz8HTcnP hKuShUB4NodEZzbLiolMLZd5JJVAziXnBZ0PRUI79BMt+k47oRXFfu5fr1RmRoQY Z/04G/QLiHPEymmq5Q65SE+E2kMe/KvHnWLAvmPzK4kjl/B4u+S0STXxSlLoH0Bu He3g550uZiYjmC4JXuSH/lk8lBmvKUy+Zk6ImhsqwcKhi6l8kyyZIgFgdCNdBI8+ a1365ds07lqUKiADjDVpn8JyZwClnl3j5kFUvDU2CURB4yDdXUCDm225AOqs19K8 wdGkrll8yUK/s9YBvSnx8sgTP3EsDiH2cCKSTnHE3d+26BIzGrbtkUiXL+S2wJdE jtO1bHCjZq1wEa8gnGty8iUyOPqa6JCyz+SuET+EeGm/Xf4Q79zk60YCo3hH+17I nGq+Lk6dj6MPOrlNMFEjdHCQcuKah5ryNy0GTEDI95iC9hvuX2jghV9fee7YBtnF 3v/jaIi9W1Qyimx4KYtxJiSBcCZ2BlO/7IXOlu40g56f4V0RqvFnm/yN4qozNEmY Ez3alE1Jd+zlvBFUrkWSJjj9mB4NAsHnUYSes99m6E0qgMYVbuQ75Noe03LQBbI6 8wCAhZNQ3SI4ZUN7CPKS =vRMn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 17:48:50 UTC