W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Agenda for the Sept 11 call (V01)

From: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:57:01 -0400
Message-ID: <523092CD.8030705@appnexus.com>
To: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
CC: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Why does the agenda for today's call include "What are additional 
concrete changes to the text that are essential before we publish?"


On 2013-09-11 11:55 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> thanks for the feedback.
>
> You are correct, the review /feedback on "the plan" is still open and 
> I am expecting feedback / comments before September 13.
>
> We are required to regularily (every 3 months) report to the public 
> what we currently discuss as a working draft.
> This has been neglected in the past.  Unless stated otherwise, these 
> documents do not document consensus and may radically change anytime.
>
> I asked for objection to publishing the document (with 1/2 page of 
> disclaimers) and received none. I therefore shipped the current text 
> (with disclaimers).
>
> Sorry for the confusion. I still appreciate your inputs and we can 
> easily publish an improved WD as soon as possible after having 
> addressed your inputs.
>
>
> Regards,
> matthias
>
>
> On 11/09/2013 16:44, Shane M Wiley wrote:
>>
>> Matthias,
>>
>> As a reminder, the deadline was extended to this Friday due to Rosh 
>> Hashanah last week.
>>
>> - Shane
>>
>> *From:*Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) 
>> [mailto:mts-std@schunter.org]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:35 AM
>> *To:* David Wainberg
>> *Cc:* public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
>> *Subject:* Re: Agenda for the Sept 11 call (V01)
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> thanks a lot for your input.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the deadline on comments has passed yesterday and this 
>> snapshot is currently under submission for publication.
>> It should have sufficient disclaimers (I tried my best) and I would 
>> appreciate your inputs for the next release that we will publish soon.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> matthias
>>
>> On 11/09/2013 15:41, David Wainberg wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Matthias,
>>
>>     On 2013-09-05 7:35 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
>>
>>         6. Publication of the current editor's draft as a working draft:
>>         http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html
>>             I have asked our editors to
>>                 - insert a disclaimer that this is only the current
>>         starting point of our
>>                     discussion and that the text is not consensus of
>>         the group.
>>                 - to list the issues currently open
>>                 - Indicating that more issues can be raised until
>>         October 02.
>>            Discussion (you may email before the call, too):
>>            What are additional concrete changes to the text that are
>>         essential before we publish?
>>
>>     In my view, we're not ready to publish this as a Working Draft.
>>     There are too many open issues and questions about the process
>>     going forward. According to W3C process, publication of a Working
>>     Draft is an indication to the world at large that the doc is
>>     approaching last call and is ready for broad public review. I
>>     don't think we're there yet. I would ask that we hold on doing
>>     this until things settle a bit.
>>
>>     Much thanks.
>>
>>     Regards,
>>
>>     David
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 15:57:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:18 UTC