- From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:00:12 +0100
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: "Mike O'Neill" <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>, "'David Singer'" <singer@apple.com>, "'Carl Cargill'" <cargill@adobe.com>, public-tracking@w3.org
Comment noted, you can save your objection for the Call for objections. Rob Roy T. Fielding schreef op 2013-10-30 20:18: > On Oct 30, 2013, at 9:53 AM, Rob van Eijk wrote: > >> non normative addendum: >> >> Tracking includes automated real time decisions, intended to analyse >> or predict the personality or certain personal aspects relating to a >> natural person, including the analysis and prediction of the person’s >> health, economic situation, information on political or philosophical >> beliefs , performance at work, leisure, personal preferences or >> interests, details and patterns on behavior, detailed location or >> movements. > > To be perfectly clear, NO. Tracking does not include those things > unless they happen to be based on tracking data, and thus the above > text has nothing to do with the definition of tracking itself. > For example, the above is already being done with contextual data > present in a single request. > >> Tracking is defined in a technological neutral way and includes e.g. >> cookie based tracking technology, active and passive fingerprinting >> techniques. > > Which is clear from either proposed definition (but not the > proposal of no definition) and does not need to be repeated. > > ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 20:00:55 UTC