Nick,

It is important that a network transaction is a single request (and its associated responses). That what was meant when we discussed Option B.  If you try and encompass multiple requests then the definition becomes vague and so useless.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas Doty [mailto:npdoty@w3.org]
> Sent: 25 November 2013 02:02
> To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
> Subject: Revise network interaction definition issue-217 issue-228
>
> *** gpg4o |  Unknown Signature from 40203EE90BBAB306 1 2 01 1385344914 9
> ***
>
> I haven't seen any additional suggestions/revisions on the network interaction
> definition(s). To a question that came up on the call, I've added what I believe to
> be a friendly clarification to both proposals on the wiki [0], namely that if a term
> isn't ultimately used in a document, then we wouldn't keep the (apparently
> unnecessary) definition. I hope that addresses the concerns raised by Rob and
> Mike.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> [0]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Revise_network_int
> eraction_definition