Re: June Change Proposal: Partial Compliance

Thanks, noted here:
	http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Partial_Compliance

Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler)




On 2013-06-30, at 22:33 +0200, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote:

> Yep, thanks.
> 
> 
> On Sunday, June 30, 2013, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2013-06-26, at 08:54 +0200, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote:
> 
> > I would propose we add this text:
> >> A website MAY NOT be in partial compliance with the TPE or TCS documents.
> 
> Editorial clarification: There is no such thing as "MAY NOT."  Do you mean "MUST NOT"?
> 
> >> Example: A website is testing support for the TPE protocol by connecting it to a proprietary compliance standard.  It must not represent compliance with "Do Not Track" unless it adheres to the requirements of both TPE and TCS.
> >
>