- From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:16:15 -0700
- To: Jack Hobaugh <jack@networkadvertising.org>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-tracking@w3.org
Jack, The redline is helpful, but there is another problem. To me at least it is even more serious. During the working group's deliberations various proposals on raised issues have been made. There has always been an accompanying explanation and justification for the proposal. People might not have agreed with a proposal, but they at least understood the thinking behind it. You've presented your changes with no context, background or explanation. I find it difficult to take such an 11th-hour approach seriously. Indeed, if I didn't have a thick skin, I'd be insulted. Cheers, John On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:58 AM, Jack Hobaugh <jack@networkadvertising.org> wrote: > <NAI-DAA-DMA June 26 draft compared to June 22 Tracking Compliance and Scope copy.pdf>
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 13:16:58 UTC