W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Change Proposal - First party compliance (Issue - 170)

From: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:34:02 -0700
Cc: <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A195C2A5-814C-41AF-8063-B7A4E9BEC2AB@w3.org>
To: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
Hi Alan,

I've added your proposal to the relevant wiki page:
http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_First_Party_Compliance

Your text might be interpreted as a change to the definition of tracking, but I suspect that your intention is to limit use of data collected in a first party experience to the compliance requirements and permitted uses when used in a third party context. The editors are likely best suited to making sure we use consistent terminology, but if you or the editors want to clarify that text on the wiki, please go ahead!

Thanks,
Nick

On Jun 26, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com> wrote:

> I propose the following change to section 4 of the June draft (new language in last sentance in bold)
> 
> If a first party receives a DNT:1 signal the first party MAY engage in its normal collection and use of information. This includes the ability to customize the content, services, and advertising in the context of the first party experience. Use of this information outside the first party context is tracking and subject to third party rules for tracking as outlined in Section 5 below.
> 
> Its worth noting that while he has not seen this language and therefore does not support the above language, Chris Pedigo and I have agreed to work on language in this area over the next couple of days.
> 
> Alan
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 07:34:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:13 UTC