W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2013

Change proposal Issue-201

From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:45:11 +0200
To: "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7842bffa-436d-4ae7-8b5a-b4650a5bcb4c@email.android.com>

Dear group,

hereby my text proposal for issue-201. It is also open for discussion.

Nick could you please add it to the change list for the June Draft?

Thanks,
Rob

Text proposal:
<text>
In general, OOBC trumps UGE. 

OOBC:
When a party relies on OOBC, it MUST use the tracking status value "C" and a well as a provide a well known resource/control link to easily revoke consent. A user agent MAY change the DNT expression to DNT:0 for that network interaction.

UGE:
When a party relies on UGE, and a user grants a UGE, the user agent MUST change the DNT expression to DNT:0 for that network interaction. The user agent MUST provide easy access to the list of UGEs as well as provide a means to easily revoke an individual UGE or all UGEs. 
</text>
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 20:45:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 24 June 2013 20:45:43 UTC