- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:32:44 +0200
- To: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org, Sid Stamm <sid@mozilla.com>, Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
Alan, On Monday 15 July 2013 13:25:26 Alan Chapell wrote: > Thanks Rigo. Does this language (borrowed from David Singer) work > better? > > > "A user agent MUST NOT share information related to the network > interaction with any party other than the user without consent." This would mean that the user agent can not load a thing without consent. Because the user agent must share IP address and other things with a lot of parties other than the user to obtain the content and just that (not even tracking). I know what you mean, the wording still doesn't do the trick. The problem here is not the consensus, but the wording... --Rigo > > On 7/10/13 1:39 PM, "Rigo Wenning" <rigo@w3.org> wrote: > >Sid, > > > >I think what they want to say is that the browser shouldn't phone > >home and reveal information collected client side. To put that in > >words is non trivial. I agree that the current wording covers too > >much of the actual network interaction between browser and server > >that is not meant. > > > >One way of addressing that is to treat extensions and widgets like > >web pages and either treat them as first or third parties. Another > >possibility is to say that the browser should not share historical > >information or actual browsing information outside of the browsing > >context it was collected for. > > > >But we need more ideas on wording here..
Received on Monday, 15 July 2013 20:33:14 UTC