- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:06:34 -0700
- To: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:47 AM, Justin Brookman wrote: > On Jul 8, 2013, at 8:39 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: >> On Jul 8, 2013, at 8:24 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> No, we don't require that it be set 'individually' we say it has to be the result of a conscious choice by the user. The user indicating that they want 'private browsing', which requests BOTH local and remote behavior (a new local context, and DNT sent) is entirely consistent with an explicit user choice >> >> Yes, as is stated in TPE section 3, IIRC. >> >> …Roy >> > > Which some members of the working group have said is wrong and needs to be revised . . . If they can state their opinions in the form of a change proposal to TPE that doesn't contradict the WG's prior closed decisions, then the editors can address them. Until that happens, I am assuming that there is no objection to the TPE section 3 (and anything in Compliance that happens to contradict it is a bug in Compliance, since TCS has no responsibility for this part of the protocol). ....Roy
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 17:06:59 UTC