- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 15:36:05 -1000
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org List" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Jul 6, 2013, at 5:29 PM, David Singer wrote: > On Jul 6, 2013, at 10:20 , Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: > >> I can't speak to the DAA proposal (having not even read it yet while on vacation), but I can say that I will continue disregarding semantically invalid HTTP signals no matter what anyone else's opinion might be. > > syntactically invalid I understand. > > what do you mean by 'semantically invalid'? contradictory? or you believe I don't mean what I am saying? or something else? DNT:1 has a defined semantic. If it is sent by a client when that semantic is not true, then it is an invalid use of HTTP. ....Roy
Received on Monday, 8 July 2013 01:36:33 UTC