Re: Agenda for 21 January 2012 TPE call - V03

Thanks JC & Good point

Any volunteers for scribing today?

matthias

On 22/01/2013 20:43, JC Cannon wrote:
>
> You should try asking for a volunteer scribe now and see if that works.
>
> JC
>
> *From:*Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) 
> [mailto:mts-std@schunter.org]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 22, 2013 11:36 AM
> *To:* public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
> *Subject:* Agenda for 21 January 2012 TPE call - V03
>
> Hi Team,
>
> V03:
> - Corrected the date (sorry for the time-warp ;-)
> - Added some pointers to discusions on the mailing list
> - Added ISSUE-111 to the list of issues to be discussed
>
> Regards,
> matthias
>
> ---------------------------
> Administrative
> ---------------------------
>
> 1. Selection of scribe
>
> ---------------------------
> Old business
> ---------------------------
>
> 2. Review of overdue action items: 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/overdue?sort=owne 
> <http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner>
>
> 3.Offline-caller-identification:
>
> If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your 
> phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call 
> (command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in 
> my case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of  time. If you 
> are not comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your 
> phone number, please email your name and phone number to npdoty@w3.org 
> <mailto:npdoty@w3.org> by 8am PT tomorrow. We want to reduce (in fact, 
> eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note 
> that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to 
> off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.
>
>
> ---------------------------
> 4. ISSUES marked OPEN
> ---------------------------
> Goal: review open issues at 
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/products/2
> and assign actions to them
>
> ISSUE-153: What are the implications on software that changes requests 
> but does not necessarily initiate them?
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/153
>       Proposed text (by david and nick): "Software outside of the user 
> agent that causes a DNT header to be sent (or modifies existing 
> headers) MUST NOT
>    do so without following the requirements of this section; such 
> software is responsible for assuring the expressed preference reflects 
> the user's intent."
>
> More input from David Wainberg and discussion by David Singer:
>   http://www.w3.org/mid/13C7BCD8-CE40-4D71-A06E-97F55128CBC4@apple.com>
>   
>
>
> ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior 
> while granting and for future requests?
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/144
> - Discussions:
>     - Do we need any constraints on user agent behavior?
>     - If yes:
>        - What specific constraints should we specify for user-granted 
> exceptions
> - Related discussions (probably not during call but rather at the F2F):
>        - How can we "police" user agents?
>        - How to handle "non-compliant" user agents?
> - Response by David Singer:
> http://www.w3.org/mid/10DCB04C-30D0-43D2-BBDF-1672619C4016@apple.com
>
>
> ISSUE-137: Does hybrid tracking status need to distinguish between 
> first party (1) and outsourcing service provider acting as a first 
> party (s)
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/137
> - Roy (ACTION-354) plans to provide input on ISSUE-137.
> - David Singer: "Before you read all the long email, realize that Roy 
> points out that the new first-party resource tells a system both (a) 
> that my first-party is someone other than me, which is what the 
> qualifier indicated, and (b) who that is, which the qualifier relied 
> on something else for. So it may well be true (pending reading the 
> text) that the qualifier is not needed."
>
> ISSUE-111: Signaling state/existence of site-specific exceptions
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/111
>
> As David Singer pointer out: Now that the new approach to exceptions  
> and the Javascript API is stabilising, we can revisit ISSUE-111 (which 
> I changed from POSTPONED to OPEN)
>
>
> ---------------------------
>
> 5. ISSUES marked PENDING REVIEW
> ---------------------------
>
> I have sent an email for batch closing of some ISSUES to the list.
> Please review and respond as needed.
>
>
> ---------------------------
>
> 6. Announce next meeting & adjourn
>
> ================ Infrastructure =================
>
> Zakim teleconference bridge:
> VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
> Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)
> IRC Chat: irc.w3.org <http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt
>
> *****
>