W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > December 2013

Re: ISSUE-239: Link to compliance document

From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:40:39 -0800
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Message-Id: <7FC8F09E-F8EC-4F40-96B4-EA8346FABA62@consumerwatchdog.org>
To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
I agree with Walter.  It ought to be a mustů

On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> On 16/12/2013 15:23, mts-std@schunter.org wrote:
> 
>> If nobody makes a case for / against including this link, I suggest to
>> continue with the Status quo and reject Roy's proposed edit and not
>> include a link.
> 
> It may possibly be such a no-brainer that we accept at least the gist of
> Roy's proposed edit that we haven't really discussed it so far. If
> anything, since we are about control and transparency for the user, I
> would be in favour of strengthening the MAY into a MUST. Because it
> should be clear what compliance spec a site is following if it claims
> any form of compliance at all. It also meshes better with the way the
> web works than a specific compliance spec identifier.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Walter
> 
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 19:41:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 16 December 2013 19:41:07 UTC