W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Agenda for September 19, 2012 call

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:34:37 -0700
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-id: <02AEA46D-5ED5-4C26-9352-836CE8A3C96A@apple.com>
To: Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org> (Intel Corporation)
My regrets for this call; I will do my best to monitor on IRC, but I have a conflicting standards meeting

On Sep 18, 2012, at 12:52 , Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org> wrote:

> ps: no need to time-travel: now with the correct (tomorrow's) date ;-)
> 
> Chair:
>           Matthias
> 
>           
> 
>         
> Main topic:    Publication of TPE spec as working draft
>  - Discussion of open issues
> 
> ---------------------------
> Administrative
> ---------------------------
> 
> 1.  Selection of scribe
> 
> ---------------------------
> Old business
> ---------------------------
> 
> 2.  Review of overdue action items:  http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner
> 
> 3. Any comments on published minutes
> 
> 4. Quick check that callers are identified
> 
> 5. Feedback on the working groups tri-state decision
>     http://www.w3.org/mid/95ECA317-2FF0-46D8-B2F9-52F17CD5F9BA@aleecia.com
> 
> ---------------------------
> New business
> ---------------------------
> 
> 6. Publication of the TPE spec as working draft:
>  http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html
>  Are there objections against creating a snapshot of this document to be published as our next TPE working draft?    
> 
> 7. Discuss open issues. Goal is to either close the issue or else assign an action that brings us towards being able to close the issue.
> 
> ISSUE 137:
>         Service provider flag 
> 
>         http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/137
> 
>         - Report on progress made: 
> 
>         - Tom raised a usecase that it should be possible to delineate
>         the boundaries of a parties
> 
>         services providers (in the absence of this flag) may inhibit
>         this usecase since 
> 
>         service providers would be "part of" multiple first parties
> 
>         - Discuss next steps?
> 
>         ISSUE 116 JScript DOM Properties
> 
>         http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/116
> 
>         Review proposed changes by Nick:
> 
>         http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Sep/0114.html
> 
> ISSUE-112: How are sub-domains handled for site specific exceptions
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/112
> - Discuss Davids post:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Aug/0046.html
> - Next steps?
> 
> ISSUE-138: How can providers without HTML real-estate obtain exceptions?
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/138
> - Discuss Alex concern
> 
> 8. (if time): Screen RAISED issues to decide which issues to open and what actions to assign:
>  http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/products/2
> 
> 99.  Announce next meeting & adjourn
> 
> ================ Infrastructure =================
> 
> Zakim teleconference bridge:
> VoIP:    sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
> Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)
> IRC Chat: irc.w3.org, port 6665, #dnt
> 
> *****

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 20:35:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:34 UTC