W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2012

Re: action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference")

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:28:47 +0200
To: Brendan Riordan-Butterworth <Brendan@iab.net>
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2111937.JVGogEdQM3@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
On Monday 17 September 2012 21:26:52 Brendan Riordan-Butterworth 
> Rigo, the question portion of your text seems to indicate that you
> expect the spec to indicate that it can, while the sentence
> portion of your text seems to indicate that it can't.  Would you
> mind clearing that confusion up for me?

Sorry for the confusion. If we do not force the browser to reveal 
additional information, the first party can't know. It is a bit like 
sending a referrer. And my question is simply whether we have 
removed that feature again (was discussed in Washington F2F). And I 
hear David saying "yes". So you can assume that in the current 
version, the first party can't know what the browser does to its 
third parties.

Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 08:29:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:55 UTC