Re: action-241: Propose changes regarding issue-116 (and also "general preference")

On Monday 17 September 2012 21:26:52 Brendan Riordan-Butterworth 
wrote:
> Rigo, the question portion of your text seems to indicate that you
> expect the spec to indicate that it can, while the sentence
> portion of your text seems to indicate that it can't.  Would you
> mind clearing that confusion up for me?

Sorry for the confusion. If we do not force the browser to reveal 
additional information, the first party can't know. It is a bit like 
sending a referrer. And my question is simply whether we have 
removed that feature again (was discussed in Washington F2F). And I 
hear David saying "yes". So you can assume that in the current 
version, the first party can't know what the browser does to its 
third parties.

Rigo