Re: tracking-ISSUE-184 (Walter van Holst): 3rd party dependencies in 1st party content [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] from Rigo Wenning on 2012-10-25 (public-tracking@w3.org from October 2012)

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:43:10 +0200
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net>, "rob@blaeu.com" <rob@blaeu.com>
Message-ID: <4466296.MhGMi5WbjH@hegel.sophia.w3.org>

Chris, 

we are starting work on global considerations, and this is more or 
less about consent. I have gathered sufficient interest there. I 
think your unease stems from another angle of this that I will 
address in a reply to Rob. 

Rigo

On Wednesday 24 October 2012 20:01:07 Chris Mejia wrote:
> With reference to your last point, "to what extent is such consent
> informed, genuine and meaningful?", I'd like to point out that
> this group has largely rejected the same principals of meaningful
> and genuine informed consent when it comes to requirements on
> agents sending DNT signals.  For example, sanctions on browsers
> and UAs that set DNT for the user by default.

Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 06:43:34 UTC