Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose from Walter van Holst on 2012-10-24 (public-tracking@w3.org from October 2012)

From: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:04:32 +0200
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Message-ID: <5087BD30.2050204@xs4all.nl>

On 10/24/12 12:45 AM, Rob van Eijk wrote:

> My counter text proposal is therefore:
> 
> SILENCE <i.e. we do not deal with it in DNT>

Normally I wouldn't concur, but given the MRC discussion's derailment I
think this the least bad compromise on this matter. I definitely agree
that Amy's proposed text has too many loopholes.

Regards,

 Walter

Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 10:05:03 UTC