- From: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:08:46 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
On 10/19/12 12:47 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > That is why, when Berin cautioned that a group of regulators or > legislators or a judicial process would interpret these words > more forcefully, our response was that they are INTENDED to be > interpreted forcefully -- they are requirements of the protocol. > That is why we have a normative reference to RFC2119. I agree wholeheartedly and also have to confess I was rather puzzled by the ease with which terminology that has been around for a long time and formalised in 1997 in a period in which a great deal of internet standards came to fruition all of a sudden was dismissed as too vague. Regards, Walter
Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 08:09:17 UTC