W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Adage article

From: achapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:37:02 -0700
Message-ID: <vj1lak4bp0yqb7tjnnf6urtt.1350588970619@email.android.com>
To: gelman@blurryedge.com
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Hi Lauren

Wrong on both counts.

More later....



Cheers,

Alan Chapell
917 318 8440Lauren Gelman <gelman@blurryedge.com> wrote:
The privacy advocates following this would DEFINITELY prefer this to be applied to first parties.  But all the messaging **since the FTC report** has been clear that this process was to be limited.  There are hundreds of messages on this topic from back in 2011.  But in the interest of compromise and in order to jump start the working group, the privacy groups agreed to contain this process to 3rd parties.

Maybe you are unfamiliar with this history because you have not been involved in the process that long??Otherwise, best I can guess is that you are trying to goad people into arguing on this point, with the hope that if there is enough critique from all sides, it will kill DNT. 

Lauren Gelman
BlurryEdge Strategies
415-627-8512

On Oct 18, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Alan Chapell wrote:

I thought many of your would find this interesting… 

http://adage.com/article/digitalnext/real-impact-track/237808/

-a
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 19:37:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:36 UTC