W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose

From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:14:01 -0700
Message-Id: <CEBCCD0E-C4CF-4EDE-B658-9FCA178736EA@consumerwatchdog.org>
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
To: Amy Colando (LCA) <acolando@microsoft.com>
I'm sorry, maybe I missed something -- it certainly wouldn't be the first time -- but what is MRC accreditation?


----------
John M. Simpson
Consumer Advocate
Consumer Watchdog
2701 Ocean Park Blvd., Suite 112
Santa Monica, CA,90405
Tel: 310-392-7041
Cell: 310-292-1902
www.ConsumerWatchdog.org
john@consumerwatchdog.org

On Oct 17, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Amy Colando (LCA) wrote:

> Hi John.
>  
> This was intended to address the MRC accreditation scenario that was previously raised. 
>  
> From: John Simpson [mailto:john@consumerwatchdog.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:19 PM
> To: Amy Colando (LCA)
> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Proposed Text for Local Law and Public Purpose
>  
> Amy,
>  
> A clarifying question: Can you please give a use case for what sort of data would be collected for "relevant self-regulatory requirements"?
> Thanks,
> John
>  
> ----------
> John M. Simpson
> Consumer Advocate
> Consumer Watchdog
> 2701 Ocean Park Blvd., Suite 112
> Santa Monica, CA,90405
> Tel: 310-392-7041
> Cell: 310-292-1902
> www.ConsumerWatchdog.org
> john@consumerwatchdog.org
>  
> On Oct 17, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Amy Colando (LCA) wrote:
> 
> 
> Apologies that I have lost track of Action number, which I will look up later.  Many thanks to Vinay, MeMe and David W. for assisting with this text.
>  
> 6.1.1.9 Compliance with Local Law and Public Purpose
>  
> Normative: Regardless of DNT signal, information MAY be collected, retained, used and shared for complying with applicable laws, regulations, legal obligations and other public purposes, including, but not limited to, intellectual property protection, delivery of emergency services, and relevant self-regulatory verification requirements.
>  
> Non-normative: This specification does not purport to require parties to breach existing contractual obligations.  At the same time, it is expected that parties implementing this specification should not enter into new contractual obligations that have the effect of circumventing specification requirements. This specification recognizes that there are legitimate self-regulatory regimes that both protect consumer interests and govern certain data practices, and the specification does not intend to conflict with these regimes. However, parties should whenever possible adhere to the letter and spirit of this specification, and should not look to such regimes as merely a means to circumvent the specification.
>  
>  
>  
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 21:13:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:36 UTC