W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > November 2012

Re: ISSUE-187 - some thoughts on using javascript

From: Vinay Goel <vigoel@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 11:54:37 -0800
To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CCC177F5.1D363%vigoel@adobe.com>
Hi Walter,

I'd question whether the consumer is aware that its UGE is stored in a
cookie.  If the UGE was granted as 'bypass your Do Not Track setting', I
would expect a consumer to think that this exception has the same
persistence as its DNT setting.

-Vinay

On 11/8/12 2:51 PM, "Walter van Holst" <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl> wrote:

>On 2012-11-08 20:47, Dobbs, Brooks wrote:
>
>> Would it be fair that a 3rd party cookie deletion tool that deletes
>> all
>> cookies every 72 hours deletes the "special" UGE cookies?  Should
>> these be
>> stored separately in addition to being set differently?
>
>That question puzzles me somewhat. How can a user chosen tool that
>happens to purge cookies, including UGE cookies, be "unfair"?
>
>Regards,
>
>  Walter
>
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 19:55:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:38 UTC