W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > May 2012

Re: REVISED Actions 176 (and dup. 183), also merged Shane's text and added Remove APIs

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 12:05:16 +0200
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Message-ID: <2156617.cGE2hX3lFB@hegel.sophia.w3.org>

On Wednesday 23 May 2012 10:33:02 David Singer wrote:
> 2. is the grant request agreed or denied as a package, or can the user
> pick-and-choose which sites to grant to? proposed answer: it's a package;
> the UI is probably unmanageable, and the site is asking about the 3rd
> parties it cares about, and probably needs them all

You only reflect the opinion expressed by Ian Fette. If we have 
explicit/explicit pairs, we do not interfere with how to represent them. A 
tool for me (e.g. http://code.w3.org/privacy-dashboard/ ) would list those 
pairs and allow me to make informed decisions. 

My arguments so far: 

If we do web-wide exceptions we MUST also accept web-wide denials to remain 
credible. If we accept web-wide denials, there will always be an option 
where some third party will not work on the site and may have to ask for a 
specific exception to be able to track on that web site. All this needs 
explicit/explicit pairs and an interface for it. A browser may chose not to 
implement this and only allow a granularity of [all or *], but the 
Specification should not limit the functionality here. 

So there can be a package, but it can't be limited only to a package.


Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 10:05:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:48 UTC