W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Summary of Discussions on user-granted Exceptions [consensus check on ISSUE-129 and ISSUE-130]

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:59:02 +0200
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Vinay Goel <vigoel@adobe.com>, Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>
Message-ID: <1461188.CtO83rNNqu@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
Agree, as long as the semantics of what is declared (we accept DNT;0 or 1 
etc) remain limited. But we should be clear that someone making that request 
will be liable for his declarations. This way, A can request for B. But if B 
doesn't exist I can turn back to A.

Rigo

On Monday 14 May 2012 08:57:47 Shane Wiley wrote:
> Agree with Vinay - I can see appropriate situations where one party may
> request a web-wide exception for another party.  As was discussed in DC,
> it would be better to focus on the technical details (TPE) here so we can
> close at least close on the interface.
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 07:59:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:28 UTC