W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > May 2012

Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 00:40:34 +0200
To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: "rob@blaeu.com" <rob@blaeu.com>, Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net>, Kimon Zorbas <vp@iabeurope.eu>, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>, Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>
Message-ID: <22278587.XyXHvCMxr1@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 14:21:32 Shane Wiley wrote:
> #2 breaks most of the ad ecosystem (security/fraud, financial/audit,
> frequency capping, basic analytics, etc.) - unique, anonymous/non-PII
> cookies are needed for basic business operations.

Which in turn is exactly the opportunity we are working on. We have talked 
about the security/fraud exceptions.. An agreed thing that has buy-in is 
much better than a conspiracy theory on what one might do with the data 
collected. We are there and we want to improve IMHO. 

Rigo
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 22:41:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:28 UTC