W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > May 2012

RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)

From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 16:47:06 +0000
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
CC: "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>, John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
Message-ID: <59A39E87EA9F964A836299497B686C350FEA5418@WABOTH9MSGUSR8D.ITServices.sbc.com>
I understand there is some history behind that specific proposal, but two things concern me:
1) The Internet services marketplace has evolved greatly since 2002
2) An updated and broader consultation is probably necessary at this point

IMO, guidelines on stored data access and use are a more pragmatic focus. The apparent simplicity of specific retention requirements is to me their key weakness. It's too easy just to establish a number and expect all SPs to comply, regardless of data retention purpose. 

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 9:11 AM
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; ifette@google.com; John Simpson
Subject: Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)

On Thursday 03 May 2012 17:57:53 SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
> IMO, any specific number of weeks ends up being arbitrary as it cannot
> consider the contextual relevance of the info for specific purposes, and
> also as we cannot reasonably limit purposes to a finite/detailed list.

I had a discussion with activists and sys-admins and ISPs in 2002 and we 
came also to 6 weeks after a much longer discussion. Let's please stick with 
6 weeks.

Rigo
Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 16:48:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:28 UTC