W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Proportionate Response for Fraud Prevention and Security (ISSUE-24)

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:48:39 -0700
Message-id: <4023D2B3-23AB-4F1D-A4F0-D9C8D7F5FA6C@apple.com>
To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>

On Mar 15, 2012, at 15:55 , Haakon Bratsberg wrote:

>> In short, we have neither the time, nor the expertise, nor the authority to
>> address this problem in general, other than to say that:
>> there exists an exemption for fraud control and data collection/retention/use
>> under that exemption must be limited to what is necessary for that fraud control.
> Couldn't agree more. 

I tend to agree as well;  but I would put this under a blanket requirement that *any* use of the data collected under any exception, for a purpose other than that allowed by the exception, is non-compliant.  (Including being lax about your security such that the data leaks and is abused, for example).

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 23:49:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:46 UTC