- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 09:05:47 +0100
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: Kevin Smith <kevsmith@adobe.com>, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 12:31:06 Kevin Smith wrote: > 1) In many cases it will not be technically feasible to know ahead of time > what 3rd parties will be included by the time a given page has fully loaded > - what good will your DNT:2 header or the API be if you do not know which > 3rd parties to ask for. Kevin, it may be that the regime under which the operation is completed will influence the ad - auction. So I assume that in the future, the ad auction will take the DNT header into account and will have an effect in this perfect market. And I assume that the highest price will be paid for ads in requests under DNT=0. IMHO the biggest problem Shane and you have to solve is NOT how to deal with massive DNT=1 occurrence, but how to get people from DNT=unset to DNT=0. The feedback system Shane is talking about is giving you potential options for the next years to come. And your "opt-back-in" system can be a lot more sophisticated if you have already more information about the entire interaction. They system allows you to react instead of remaining blind. I'm with Shane here. Rigo
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 08:06:20 UTC