W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > March 2012

Re: JS Exception API

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:57:26 +0100
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <2176742.10YYVPunH4@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
I think we mix up GUI challenges with protocol defaults. A GUI will always be 
able to offer a "*" exception, in javascript or chrome. IMHO we have to make 
sure that the browsers can distinguish the 3rd parties and react in a 
differentiated way. This is done by the described "per third party" way. And 
whether then the browser sends an exception to all third parties is the 
browser's (user's) choice. 

What Kevin raises is interesting. If a browser denies a permission for a 
certain third party, should he communicate that to the first party? This 
coincides with the discussion Shane is having about querying the DNT status. 

Concerning the GUI considerations, I don't think they should be made in the 
Specification, but I strongly encourage browser makers and others here to 
group together and pool their knowledge and perhaps write a Note (how-to) for 
such user interaction instead of everybody inventing their own. But this is 
just a suggestion and completely optional..

Rigo

On Tuesday 06 March 2012 19:14:59 Matthias Schunter wrote:
> I do not know whether, e.g., providing a "*" consent while then
> dynamically declaring/displaying the third parties in use would be
> called 'informed consent'. Such a solution would be a mix of "*"
> exceptions plus TPL-like blacklisting of some third parties.
> 
> Did I misunderstand something?
> Does anybody have ideas how to resolve this?
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 18:57:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:26 UTC