W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties

From: Peter Cranstone <peter.cranstone@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:49:14 -0600
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
CC: Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CC0BCE01.430E%peter.cranstone@gmail.com>
Interesting. So there's no such thing as a reliable UA and all UA's should
be treated as unreliable.

Makes one wonder what the purpose of the UA really is?


Peter
___________________________________
Peter J. Cranstone
720.663.1752








-----Original Message-----
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Saturday, June 23, 2012 7:47 PM
To: Peter Cranstone <peter.cranstone@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>, W3 Tracking
<public-tracking@w3.org>
Subject: Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT
values    sent to third parties

>* Peter Cranstone wrote:
>>So how does one determine what exactly is a "reliable UA"?
>
>There is no such thing for the purposes of Matthias' text.
>-- 
>Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
>Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
>25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2012 01:49:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:31 UTC