W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice

From: Kimon Zorbas <vp@iabeurope.eu>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:48:02 +0000
To: "Shane Wiley (yahoo)" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
CC: Ionel Naftanaila <training@iabeurope.eu>
Message-ID: <CC07BD00.30567%vp@iabeurope.eu>
Shane, good presentation – IAB Europe supports the draft and we hope we can move forward on that basis.

Kimon

From: Chris Pedigo <CPedigo@online-publishers.org<mailto:CPedigo@online-publishers.org>>
Date: Wednesday 20 June 2012 11:38
To: "Shane Wiley (yahoo)" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com<mailto:wileys@yahoo-inc.com>>
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>" <public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice
Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Wednesday 20 June 2012 11:38

Thanks for correcting this Shane. Looks good to us. Just wanted to ensure publishers have the flexibility.



On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:00 AM, "Shane Wiley" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com<mailto:wileys@yahoo-inc.com>> wrote:

One editorial mistake discovered (there will probably be others).  In the “Explicit and Separate User Choice” section, 4c should read:

“Servers that respond to all DNT requests as non-compliant regardless of User Agent details ARE NOT compliant with this recommendation.”

- Shane

From: Shane Wiley
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:03 AM
To: public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>
Subject: Evolving Online Privacy - Advancing User Choice

TPWG,

Please find attached the detailed proposal text we’ll be reviewing tomorrow afternoon (built upon the proposal outline I provided last week).

The following individuals, companies, and trade associations contributed to this proposal:

Marc Groman & David Wainberg – NAI
Alan Chapell – Chapell & Associates
Heather West, Sean Harvey, & Ian Fette – Google
Shane Wiley – Yahoo!

There is considerable detail covering numerous topics in this proposal and therefore it should not be consider an endorsement by all contributors to all parts of this proposal.  That said, all contributors generally agree with the direction and approach of this document.

We look forward to further discussion and fielding questions tomorrow afternoon.

Thank you,
Shane
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 00:48:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:31 UTC