W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

RE: Towards a Grand Compromise

From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:07:51 +0200
To: <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <05296d2acdbfe63ea4f6ac88592277b8@xs4all.nl>

If your position is, and correct me if I read this wrong, that a user 
shouldn't visit a site if (s)he is unhappy with the 3rd parties on that 
site, then we have arrived at a added value of DNT of ZERO in comparison 
to the current opt-out system. It this truly your current position?


Shane Wiley schreef op 2012-06-17 21:19:
> Tamir,
> The 1st party you're interacting with has decided to engage with that
> 3rd party to monetize the free content you consume (for the most 
> part,
> Ad Exchanges complicate that a bit).  If you're unhappy with the 3rd
> parties the 1st party is engaged with then don't visit that 1st party
> - or complain so they move to different 3rd parties.  Stealing 
> content
> should not be an option.
> - Shane
Received on Sunday, 17 June 2012 21:08:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:51 UTC