W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

Re: DNT:0

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:50:53 +0200
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>
Message-ID: <2590989.uc85x6PzKd@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
Folks, as said, this shortcut only works in the US legal 
environment. The previous definition would have worked also for the 
EU as we need positive semantics there (allowance talk) because we 
have to open the legislative restrictions with a positive statement 
of the user attached to that DNT:0 token. 

Rigo

On Thursday 14 June 2012 19:58:18 David Singer wrote:
> I agree;  perhaps add "as if no DNT signal had been received."
> 
> On Jun 13, 2012, at 7:40 , Shane Wiley wrote:
> > Suggest we remove discussion of specific business practices
> > since those are still under debate (akin to a definition for
> > “tracking”) and simply state that DNT:0 means a site may
> > operate as normal.>
> >  
> >
> > “Upon receiving a request with DNT:0, a site may operate as
> > normal and continue with its standard data collection,
> > retention, and use practices.”
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 20:51:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:30 UTC